Connect with us

Cincinnati Reds

Bell hiring finally rings in a new century for Reds

Published

on

The innovators are often criticized. It’ll never work, they’re told.

Wind the baseball tighter to allow more home runs? Ty Cobb hated it because it took the science out of the game. But Babe Ruth loved it, so did the fans and the sport grew. Show sports on a cable channel for 24 hours a day? Nobody will watch that. The Internet? It’s just a fad.

The Cincinnati Reds love their tradition, so it’s no surprise that it has taken them this long to embrace the modern game. This is baseball, not math, the Reds have said for the past 20 years while others have proven that math matters. Not the kind of math of counting stats that says he’s a good hitter or pitcher because he has this many of this or that. But the kind of math that looks at percentages and formulas that aren’t easy to understand. They call it analytics and it makes old-timers (mostly people over 30) roll their eyes from man caves to the broadcast booth. A lack of understanding is not a reason to dismiss an idea. It’s a reason to learn before you judge.

The Reds have finally been convinced that their way doesn’t work anymore. They’ve stopped rolling their eyes, let go of the eye-rollers who blocked progress and hired a manager with vision. Those old ways once worked for the Reds — though not as much as we’d like to think— when all teams did it that way. But when smarter ways to build a good team passed them by, so did their ability to win.

To be fair, the Reds have been moving in this direction, the one Billy Beane and the Oakland A’s began following in 1997. The Reds have an analytics director and three people they call data scientists. The problem is that too much of that information was stopping at the field manager’s door. The guys running the dugout weren’t doing enough with it. They were baseball men, after all, and they only trusted their eyes and tradition more than a spreadsheet or report they probably didn’t take the time to understand.

And the front office allowed the dysfunction to fester through Baker, Price and Riggleman. Finally, there is reason to believe that the Cincinnati Reds aren’t stuck in the 20th century.

There’s a new guy in the dugout named David Bell who has caught this vision since he left the Reds organization after managing in the minors. He’s worked for the Cardinals, Cubs and Giants, teams that have obviously done a lot more right in recent seasons than the Reds have. Yes, Bell had to leave the Reds to learn a better way.

When Bell was introduced as the new manager he said things that were an indictment of the front office and on-field dysfunction. He talked about how all of the information had to be considered from upstairs to downstairs. He asked for an offseason office upstairs and will live in Cincinnati in the offseason.

He has this crazy idea that the front office and manager’s office ought to actually work together and have shared leadership instead of a top-down model that didn’t work. Remember Jesse Winker from odd-man out to everyday right fielder in a 24-hour period? Then there was the indecision about what to do with Homer Bailey. Who’s in charge we wondered? Does this team have a strategy?

Bell surely interviewed the Reds as much as they interviewed him. He discovered the lack of communication between the front office and the dugout. He must have told Dick Williams he’s ready to listen to them, and it appears they’re ready to listen to him.

This is good for the Reds. A true strategy that teaches on-field fundamentals and has an appreciation for complex data will have a chance to develop and flourish. Players will come up from the minors and maybe not sit the bench. They won’t hear a different message from the one they’ve heard in the minors.

Now this is going to take some getting used to if you don’t buy all this analytics mumbo-jumbo. The in-game moves and strategies won’t be what your used to:

  • The lineup might not be predictable.
  • You won’t agree with a lot of pitching changes.
  • You’ll wonder why Winker isn’t playing tonight.
  • Why not bunt in this situation, you’ll wonder.

And the offseason moves:

  • Why did they sign that guy?
  • Why didn’t they sign that guy?
  • Who are these all these prospects we just got for a proven player?
  • Those aren’t the pitchers we should have gone after?

Not every move will work, but you have to play the percentages. Not every move (not even close to it) worked the old way. It’s a new world in Cincinnati. If you still have a Big Red Machine hangover, get over it. Rose, Morgan, Bench and Perez would have been free-agent eligible by 1975. In today’s market, there is no way all of them (if any of them) would have been teammates that deep into their careers.

The Reds can’t compete with big payrolls. They must copy what other small-market teams like the A’s are doing. It’s the only way to have more good seasons than bad ones like the A’s have. And maybe they’ll find that year like they did in 1990.

That’s the promise of the Bell hiring. Not because he’s necessarily destined to be a great manager but because his hiring has signaled a fundamental change in the way the Reds intend to do business. Maybe Bell will preside over the next playoff team, maybe he won’t.

But at least we can finally welcome the Reds to the 21st century.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Podcast

Jeff Brantley talks Bell, new pitching coach Derek Johnson and more

James Rapien

Published

on

I discuss one free agent pitcher that should be on the Reds’ radar, plus Jeff Brantley joins me to discuss the hiring of manager David Bell and pitching coach Derek Johnson on today’s podcast. Listen and subscribe below.

Continue Reading

Cincinnati Reds

Reds Tab Johnson to Lead Pitching Renaissance

Jeffery Carr

Published

on

© Benny Sieu-USA TODAY Sports

The second big move of the offseason for the Cincinnati Reds came last night with the signing of a new pitching coach, Derek Johnson. The Reds nabbed him from Milwaukee, a team that largely outperformed expectations to finish 6th in pitching.

Johnson has been the Brewers pitching coach for four seasons and is highly regarded by the league and pretty much everyone. Those who are around the Reds organization are 100% on board with this hire.

His departure, while the third Milwaukee assistant to jump ship, drew the ire of those around the Brewers organization.

Sometimes reactions are evidence enough, but let’s look into Derek Johnson. He was a college pitcher, but never toed the rubber in the major leagues. Doesn’t seem to have hindered him in the coaching arena, where he has a ton of experience. He began coaching in college, and even coached at Vanderbilt for a bit, who happen to be pretty good at baseball. He even coached Sonny Gray, there, who is a possible target to bring into the Reds rotation.

His foray into professional coaching began with coordinating the Cubs minor league pitchers 2013 through 2014. That’s when the Brewers hired him onto their pitching coaching staff. Once with the Brew Crew, he immediately got to the developing of guys like Chase Anderson, Junior Guerra, Jhoulys Chacin, and other overachievers. Heck, the guy wrote the book on pitching, back in 2012 (see The Complete Guide to Pitching).

Another key factor, which has been the theme pf the Reds offseason, is he’s a coach who embraces analytics. He doesn’t go only analytics, though, and tends to use what will best aid a pitcher, without over-informing him. One thing that has been prevalent in interviews with David Bell is that there is a happy medium with analytics, and Johnson is on board with that.

Johnson also had a quote, in an interview with the Journal Sentinel, that I found interesting, and it just continues to excite me about this hire. On the question of if his personality is that of anonymity, he said this:

“I would say for sure. First off, this game is never about a coach. It’s always about the players. Players play, coaches coach. For me, we’re grinding away in the bullpens and we’re working on stuff in the games and trying to figure out what to do next and, really, that’s my main job and my main focus. The interviews, and all that kind of stuff, that’s for the players.”

I found this to be of interest, too:

Journal Sentinel: “The sentiment outside the organization coming into the season was that Brewers needed to sign or trade for 1-2 established starters in order to contend. Instead, Jhoulys Chacín was signed to a smaller, shorter deal and you’ve relied on your holdovers to fill out the rotation with Jimmy Nelson out and Chase Anderson and Zach Davies not pitching as well as they did in 2017. How satisfying is that?”

Derek Johnson: “I’m very proud of them. I’m very proud of how they’ve gone out and competed and stuck with some of the things that we’ve done in the bullpen and where we’re trying to go. I think a big part of my personality and the way I think of things is, ‘These are our guys – they’re Brewers.’ And right now, the other guys who aren’t Brewers, they don’t concern me at all, and they won’t until they become Brewers. That’s above my pay grade. What I have are 13 guys and we’re doing the best we can with them. They’re our guys right now, and I like it that way. I don’t want for anything else. It’s what we are and who we have and these are the guys that are putting the uniform on every day. I think it’s really important and honorable for us to think of it that way. I don’t care about other pitchers; I care about them.”

From what I gather from all the sources and people I’ve read, this is a good hire. Welcome to Cincinnati, Derek Johnson.

Follow @jefffcarr and @lockedonReds on Twitter for more content.

Continue Reading

Cincinnati Reds

A Fistful of Free Agents

Jeffery Carr

Published

on

© The Enquirer-USA TODAY Sports

This is the most pivotal offseason for the Cincinnati Reds in the last decade. Moves need to be made, trades need to be had, and improvement from outside help must come, should any hope of improvement come. The free agent picture is coming into focus, and there are a lot of intriguing option that Cincinnati should kick the tires on, outside of who’d you expect.

A lot of fans, myself included, really are hoping for some way that Dallas Keuchel agrees to pitch for the Reds. Patrick Corbin, Clayton Kershaw, and guys like that have been thrown around as wishful targets. Lets take a look at five other candidates who could offer immediate improvement that haven’t been constantly talked about, in no particular order.

Trevor Cahill – He’ll be 31 this next season, but he fits the mold of a solid number four starter. Cahill’s career ERA is 4.08, but last season he pitched to a 3.76 clip. In 110 innings pitched, he struck out 100 and kept his WHIP at 1.19. Most importantly, for a Reds staff looking to not give up as many home runs, Cahill allowed just eight. At $1.5 million for last year, he was a bargain for the thrifty Oakland Athletics, which should make him more than affordable for 2019. The only bit of concern, which should keep him cheap, is his home-road splits from last year. He had a 1.84 ERA in 11 starts at Oakland Coliseum, but a 6.41 mark in nine starts, anywhere else. Maybe not a target, out of the gate, but he should be on the Reds’ radar.

Charlie Morton – That other pitcher that is becoming a free agent after pitching with the Astros a bit, Morton I no longer a kid Pirate at 34 but has reinvented himself with fantastic results. He was an All Star, last season, going 15-3 in 30 starts. He compiled a 3.13 ERA in 167 innings while piling up a career-best 201 strikeouts. In fact, his wins, ERA, strikeouts, starts, and 1.16 WHIP were all career bests. He wont be quite as affordable as Cahill, but he will be a better option and not too expensive, relatively speaking. The biggest question will be if he actually is available. He’s contemplated retiring, but also said he wants to remain an Astro.

Nathan Eovaldi – He’ll be 29, next season, and he’s coming off a year of improvement. He pitched well for the world champs and may end up staying there, but if he’s available, he’s exactly the kind of guy who could be a number three starter for the Reds. He averaged 8.2 strikeouts per nine innings and five strikeouts per walk. His command was strong, keeping his walks per nine at 1.6, a much-needed trait for Reds pitching in 2019. He made just $2 million last year, and may be due for a raise, but I don’t think it will be a monumental jump. He was hitting a high number on the rdar gun, in the World Series, which may draw attention from other clubs, but the Reds should not be dissuaded by competition to get their guy.

Adam Ottavino – This one is ambitious. He’s going to be highly coveted, and he’s got a bit of a tender shoulder, but he has been one of the best late-inning right handers in the game, the last two years. He’s going to command some money, but this will give the Reds depth in the bullpen and help them maintain their strength, throughout 2019. David Hernandez and Jared Hughes were phenomenal finds for the front office, last year, and will factor into 2019. But their usage really seemed to weigh them down, toward the end of 2018. If you have a healthy Michael Lorenzen and a man who has a 3.36 ERA over the last three years helping bolster the offerings outside of Raisel Iglesias, that would be one of the best bullpens in the league.

Tyson Ross – More of a flyer than bonafide game changer (though he could still be that), Ross finished the season a Cardinal, in 2018, and pitched 26+ innings with a sub 3.00 ERA, mostly in relief. He could be a candidate to push the kids for the fifth starting spot, and may even be available closer to spring training. He’d be a decent fallback option with little risk as he only garnered 41.75 million last season.

Keep it tuned to Locked on Reds throughout the offseason for plenty of coverage and thought-provoking content. Okay, well, there will be news, anyway.

Follow @lockedonReds and @jefffcarr on Twitter.

Continue Reading

Trending